Clinical benefit and predictors of response to momelotinib after ruxolitinib failure: A cooperative real-world study. in Cancer / Cancer. 2026 May 15;132(10):e70457. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70457.
2026
AOU Alessandria
AOU Alessandria
Tipo pubblicazione
Journal Article
Autori/Collaboratori (42)Vedi tutti...
Palandri F
Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marchetti M
Hematology and Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Elli EM
Divisione di Ematologia e Unità Trapianto di Midollo, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
et alii...
Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marchetti M
Hematology and Transplant Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Elli EM
Divisione di Ematologia e Unità Trapianto di Midollo, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
et alii...
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Momelotinib, a JAK1/JAK2/ACVR1 inhibitor, is approved for treating myelofibrosis with splenomegaly, symptoms, and moderate-to-severe anemia. Evidence on its real-world effectiveness after ruxolitinib failure is limited. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 221 patients who received momelotinib after ruxolitinib failure by assessing spleen, symptom, and anemia responses, safety, and survival. Logistic regression analyses identified the responses' predictors. RESULTS: Before momelotinib initiation, all patients had received ruxolitinib for a median of 31.5 months and discontinued as a result of resistance (29.9%), intolerance (48.0%), or both (22.1%). At baseline, all patients started at full dose; 97.3% presented with cytopenia, 34.8% presented with large splenomegaly, and 43.9% were highly symptomatic. Most patients (74.7%) switched from ruxolitinib stop to momelotinib within 2 months without tapering, whereas 18.1% waited over a year. After a median exposure of 8.2 months, adverse events occurred in 35.7% of patients, which prompted dose reductions or permanent discontinuation in 12.7% and 19.9% of cases, respectively. At 6 months, 30.0% achieved ?50% spleen length reduction (SR50), with higher responses in those with prior SR50 to ruxolitinib and shorter transition intervals. Symptom and anemia responses occurred in 39.2% and 63.4% of cases, respectively. After a median follow-up of 10.3 months, 11 patients (5.0%) progressed to blast phase, and 37 patients (16.7%) died. Two-year overall and progression-free survival (including death and blast phase transformation) were 60.9% and 59.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Momelotinib demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit and acceptable safety in cytopenic patients pretreated with ruxolitinib, which supports its role after ruxolitinib failure.
Accesso banca dati bibliografica
Accedi alla scheda bibliografica del documento in PUBMED
Se sei accreditato in BVS-P effettua prima l'accesso per utilizzare i nostri servizi.
PMID : 42118670
DOI : 10.1002/cncr.70457
Keywords
Humans; Nitriles; Male; Female; Pyrazoles/therapeutic use/adverse effects; Aged; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use/adverse effects/administration & dosage; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Benzamides/therapeutic use/adverse effects/administration & dosage; Primary Myelofibrosis/drug therapy/pathology; Anemia/drug therapy; Aged, 80 and over; Adult; Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use; Treatment Failure; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use/adverse effects; Janus Kinase 2/antagonists & inhibitors; Splenomegaly/drug therapy; Janus Kinase 1/antagonists & inhibitors; anemia; cytopenia; momelotinib; myelofibrosis; thrombocytopenia;

